<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><!DOCTYPE htmlPUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN""http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" /><meta name="AUTHOR" content="bkoz@redhat.com (Benjamin Kosnik)" /><meta name="KEYWORDS" content="HOWTO, libstdc++, GCC, g++, libg++, STL" /><meta name="DESCRIPTION" content="Notes on the codecvt implementation." /><title>Notes on the codecvt implementation.</title><link rel="StyleSheet" href="../lib3styles.css" type="text/css" /><link rel="Start" href="../documentation.html" type="text/html"title="GNU C++ Standard Library" /><link rel="Bookmark" href="howto.html" type="text/html" title="Localization" /><link rel="Copyright" href="../17_intro/license.html" type="text/html" /><link rel="Help" href="../faq/index.html" type="text/html" title="F.A.Q." /></head><body><h1>Notes on the codecvt implementation.</h1><p><em>prepared by Benjamin Kosnik (bkoz@redhat.com) on August 28, 2000</em></p><h2>1. Abstract</h2><p>The standard class codecvt attempts to address conversions betweendifferent character encoding schemes. In particular, the standardattempts to detail conversions between the implementation-defined widecharacters (hereafter referred to as wchar_t) and the standard typechar that is so beloved in classic "C" (which can now be referred toas narrow characters.) This document attempts to describe how the GNUlibstdc++-v3 implementation deals with the conversion between wide andnarrow characters, and also presents a framework for dealing with thehuge number of other encodings that iconv can convert, includingUnicode and UTF8. Design issues and requirements are addressed, andexamples of correct usage for both the required specializations forwide and narrow characters and the implementation-provided extendedfunctionality are given.</p><h2>2. What the standard says</h2>Around page 425 of the C++ Standard, this charming heading comes into view:<blockquote>22.2.1.5 - Template class codecvt [lib.locale.codecvt]</blockquote>The text around the codecvt definition gives some clues:<blockquote><em>-1- The class codecvt<internT,externT,stateT> is for use whenconverting from one codeset to another, such as from wide charactersto multibyte characters, between wide character encodings such asUnicode and EUC.</em></blockquote><p>Hmm. So, in some unspecified way, Unicode encodings andtranslations between other character sets should be handled by thisclass.</p><blockquote><em>-2- The stateT argument selects the pair of codesets being mapped between.</em></blockquote><p>Ah ha! Another clue...</p><blockquote><em>-3- The instantiations required in the Table ??(lib.locale.category), namely codecvt<wchar_t,char,mbstate_t> andcodecvt<char,char,mbstate_t>, convert the implementation-definednative character set. codecvt<char,char,mbstate_t> implements adegenerate conversion; it does not convert atall. codecvt<wchar_t,char,mbstate_t> converts between the nativecharacter sets for tiny and wide characters. Instantiations onmbstate_t perform conversion between encodings known to the libraryimplementor. Other encodings can be converted by specializing on auser-defined stateT type. The stateT object can contain any state thatis useful to communicate to or from the specialized do_convert member.</em></blockquote><p>At this point, a couple points become clear:</p><p>One: The standard clearly implies that attempts to add non-required(yet useful and widely used) conversions need to do so through thethird template parameter, stateT.</p><p>Two: The required conversions, by specifying mbstate_t as the thirdtemplate parameter, imply an implementation strategy that is mostly(or wholly) based on the underlying C library, and the functionsmcsrtombs and wcsrtombs in particular.</p><h2>3. Some thoughts on what would be useful</h2>Probably the most frequently asked question about code conversion is:"So dudes, what's the deal with Unicode strings?" The dude part isoptional, but apparently the usefulness of Unicode strings is prettywidely appreciated. Sadly, this specific encoding (And other usefulencodings like UTF8, UCS4, ISO 8859-10, etc etc etc) are not mentionedin the C++ standard.<p>In particular, the simple implementation detail of wchar_t's sizeseems to repeatedly confound people. Many systems use a two byte,unsigned integral type to represent wide characters, and use aninternal encoding of Unicode or UCS2. (See AIX, Microsoft NT, Java,others.) Other systems, use a four byte, unsigned integral type torepresent wide characters, and use an internal encoding ofUCS4. (GNU/Linux systems using glibc, in particular.) The Cprogramming language (and thus C++) does not specify a specific sizefor the type wchar_t.</p><p>Thus, portable C++ code cannot assume a byte size (or endianness) either.</p><p>Getting back to the frequently asked question: What about Unicode strings?</p><p>What magic spell will do this conversion?</p><p>A couple of comments:</p><p>The thought that all one needs to convert between two arbitrarycodesets is two types and some kind of state argument isunfortunate. In particular, encodings may be stateless. The naming ofthe third parameter as stateT is unfortunate, as what is really neededis some kind of generalized type that accounts for the issues thatabstract encodings will need. The minimum information that is requiredincludes:</p><ul><li><p>Identifiers for each of the codesets involved in the conversion. Forexample, using the iconv family of functions from the Single UnixSpecification (what used to be called X/Open) hosted on the GNU/Linuxoperating system allows bi-directional mapping between far more thanthe following tantalizing possibilities:</p><p>(An edited list taken from <code>`iconv --list`</code> on a Red Hat 6.2/Intel system:</p><blockquote><pre>8859_1, 8859_9, 10646-1:1993, 10646-1:1993/UCS4, ARABIC, ARABIC7,ASCII, EUC-CN, EUC-JP, EUC-KR, EUC-TW, GREEK-CCIcode, GREEK, GREEK7-OLD,GREEK7, GREEK8, HEBREW, ISO-8859-1, ISO-8859-2, ISO-8859-3,ISO-8859-4, ISO-8859-5, ISO-8859-6, ISO-8859-7, ISO-8859-8,ISO-8859-9, ISO-8859-10, ISO-8859-11, ISO-8859-13, ISO-8859-14,ISO-8859-15, ISO-10646, ISO-10646/UCS2, ISO-10646/UCS4,ISO-10646/UTF-8, ISO-10646/UTF8, SHIFT-JIS, SHIFT_JIS, UCS-2, UCS-4,UCS2, UCS4, UNICODE, UNICODEBIG, UNICODELIcodeLE, US-ASCII, US, UTF-8,UTF-16, UTF8, UTF16).</pre></blockquote><p>For iconv-based implementations, string literals for each of theencodings (ie. "UCS-2" and "UTF-8") are necessary,although for other,non-iconv implementations a table of enumerated values or some othermechanism may be required.</p></li><li>Maximum length of the identifying string literal.</li><li>Some encodings are require explicit endian-ness. As such, some kindof endian marker or other byte-order marker will be necessary. See"Footnotes for C/C++ developers" in Haible for more information onUCS-2/Unicode endian issues. (Summary: big endian seems most likely,however implementations, most notably Microsoft, vary.)</li><li>Types representing the conversion state, for conversions involvingthe machinery in the "C" library, or the conversion descriptor, forconversions using iconv (such as the type iconv_t.) Note that theconversion descriptor encodes more information than a simple encodingstate type.</li><li>Conversion descriptors for both directions of encoding. (ie, bothUCS-2 to UTF-8 and UTF-8 to UCS-2.)</li><li>Something to indicate if the conversion requested if valid.</li><li>Something to represent if the conversion descriptors are valid.</li><li>Some way to enforce strict type checking on the internal andexternal types. As part of this, the size of the internal andexternal types will need to be known.</li></ul><h2>4. Problems with "C" code conversions : thread safety, globallocales, termination.</h2>In addition, multi-threaded and multi-locale environments also impactthe design and requirements for code conversions. In particular, theyaffect the required specialization codecvt<wchar_t, char, mbstate_t>when implemented using standard "C" functions.<p>Three problems arise, one big, one of medium importance, and one small.</p><p>First, the small: mcsrtombs and wcsrtombs may not be multithread-safeon all systems required by the GNU tools. For GNU/Linux and glibc,this is not an issue.</p><p>Of medium concern, in the grand scope of things, is that the functionsused to implement this specialization work on null-terminatedstrings. Buffers, especially file buffers, may not be null-terminated,thus giving conversions that end prematurely or are otherwiseincorrect. Yikes!</p><p>The last, and fundamental problem, is the assumption of a globallocale for all the "C" functions referenced above. For something likeC++ iostreams (where codecvt is explicitly used) the notion ofmultiple locales is fundamental. In practice, most users may not runinto this limitation. However, as a quality of implementation issue,the GNU C++ library would like to offer a solution that allowsmultiple locales and or simultaneous usage with computationallycorrect results. In short, libstdc++-v3 is trying to offer, as anoption, a high-quality implementation, damn the additional complexity!</p><p>For the required specialization codecvt<wchar_t, char, mbstate_t> ,conversions are made between the internal character set (always UCS4on GNU/Linux) and whatever the currently selected locale for theLC_CTYPE category implements.</p><h2>5. Design</h2>The two required specializations are implemented as follows:<p><code>codecvt<char, char, mbstate_t></code></p><p>This is a degenerate (ie, does nothing) specialization. Implementingthis was a piece of cake.</p><p><code>codecvt<char, wchar_t, mbstate_t></code></p><p>This specialization, by specifying all the template parameters, prettymuch ties the hands of implementors. As such, the implementation isstraightforward, involving mcsrtombs for the conversions between charto wchar_t and wcsrtombs for conversions between wchar_t and char.</p><p>Neither of these two required specializations deals with Unicodecharacters. As such, libstdc++-v3 implements a partial specializationof the codecvt class with and iconv wrapper class, __enc_traits as thethird template parameter.</p><p>This implementation should be standards conformant. First of all, thestandard explicitly points out that instantiations on the thirdtemplate parameter, stateT, are the proper way to implementnon-required conversions. Second of all, the standard says (in Chapter17) that partial specializations of required classes are a-ok. Thirdof all, the requirements for the stateT type elsewhere in the standard(see 21.1.2 traits typedefs) only indicate that this type be copyconstructible.</p><p>As such, the type __enc_traits is defined as a non-templatized, PODtype to be used as the third type of a codecvt instantiation. Thistype is just a wrapper class for iconv, and provides an easy interfaceto iconv functionality.</p><p>There are two constructors for __enc_traits:</p><p><code>__enc_traits() : __in_desc(0), __out_desc(0)</code></p><p>This default constructor sets the internal encoding to some default(currently UCS4) and the external encoding to whatever is returned bynl_langinfo(CODESET).</p><p><code>__enc_traits(const char* __int, const char* __ext)</code></p><p>This constructor takes as parameters string literals that indicate thedesired internal and external encoding. There are no defaults foreither argument.</p><p>One of the issues with iconv is that the string literals identifyingconversions are not standardized. Because of this, the thought ofmandating and or enforcing some set of pre-determined valididentifiers seems iffy: thus, a more practical (and non-migraineinducing) strategy was implemented: end-users can specify any string(subject to a pre-determined length qualifier, currently 32 bytes) forencodings. It is up to the user to make sure that these strings arevalid on the target system.</p><p><code>void_M_init()</code></p><p>Strangely enough, this member function attempts to open conversiondescriptors for a given __enc_traits object. If the conversiondescriptors are not valid, the conversion descriptors returned willnot be valid and the resulting calls to the codecvt conversionfunctions will return error.</p><p><code>bool_M_good()</code></p><p>Provides a way to see if the given __enc_traits object has beenproperly initialized. If the string literals describing the desiredinternal and external encoding are not valid, initialization willfail, and this will return false. If the internal and externalencodings are valid, but iconv_open could not allocate conversiondescriptors, this will also return false. Otherwise, the object isready to convert and will return true.</p><p><code>__enc_traits(const __enc_traits&)</code></p><p>As iconv allocates memory and sets up conversion descriptors, the copyconstructor can only copy the member data pertaining to the internaland external code conversions, and not the conversion descriptorsthemselves.</p><p>Definitions for all the required codecvt member functions are providedfor this specialization, and usage of codecvt<internal character type,external character type, __enc_traits> is consistent with othercodecvt usage.</p><h2>6. Examples</h2><ul><li>a. conversions involving string literals<pre>typedef codecvt_base::result result;typedef unsigned short unicode_t;typedef unicode_t int_type;typedef char ext_type;typedef __enc_traits enc_type;typedef codecvt<int_type, ext_type, enc_type> unicode_codecvt;const ext_type* e_lit = "black pearl jasmine tea";int size = strlen(e_lit);int_type i_lit_base[24] ={ 25088, 27648, 24832, 25344, 27392, 8192, 28672, 25856, 24832, 29184,27648, 8192, 27136, 24832, 29440, 27904, 26880, 28160, 25856, 8192, 29696,25856, 24832, 2560};const int_type* i_lit = i_lit_base;const ext_type* efrom_next;const int_type* ifrom_next;ext_type* e_arr = new ext_type[size + 1];ext_type* eto_next;int_type* i_arr = new int_type[size + 1];int_type* ito_next;// construct a locale object with the specialized facet.locale loc(locale::classic(), new unicode_codecvt);// sanity check the constructed locale has the specialized facet.VERIFY( has_facet<unicode_codecvt>(loc) );const unicode_codecvt& cvt = use_facet<unicode_codecvt>(loc);// convert between const char* and unicode stringsunicode_codecvt::state_type state01("UNICODE", "ISO_8859-1");initialize_state(state01);result r1 = cvt.in(state01, e_lit, e_lit + size, efrom_next,i_arr, i_arr + size, ito_next);VERIFY( r1 == codecvt_base::ok );VERIFY( !int_traits::compare(i_arr, i_lit, size) );VERIFY( efrom_next == e_lit + size );VERIFY( ito_next == i_arr + size );</pre></li><li>b. conversions involving std::string</li><li>c. conversions involving std::filebuf and std::ostream</li></ul>More information can be found in the following testcases:<ul><li> testsuite/22_locale/codecvt_char_char.cc </li><li> testsuite/22_locale/codecvt_unicode_wchar_t.cc </li><li> testsuite/22_locale/codecvt_unicode_char.cc </li><li> testsuite/22_locale/codecvt_wchar_t_char.cc </li></ul><h2>7. Unresolved Issues</h2><ul><li>a. things that are sketchy, or remain unimplemented:do_encoding, max_length and length member functionsare only weakly implemented. I have no idea how to dothis correctly, and in a generic manner. Nathan?</li><li>b. conversions involving std::string<ul><li>how should operators != and == work for string ofdifferent/same encoding?</li><li>what is equal? A byte by byte comparison or anencoding then byte comparison?</li><li>conversions between narrow, wide, and unicode strings</li></ul></li><li>c. conversions involving std::filebuf and std::ostream<ul><li>how to initialize the state object in astandards-conformant manner?</li><li>how to synchronize the "C" and "C++"conversion information?</li><li>wchar_t/char internal buffers and conversions betweeninternal/external buffers?</li></ul></li></ul><h2>8. Acknowledgments</h2>Ulrich Drepper for the iconv suggestions and patient answering oflate-night questions, Jason Merrill for the template partialspecialization hints, language clarification, and wchar_t fixes.<h2>9. Bibliography / Referenced Documents</h2>Drepper, Ulrich, GNU libc (glibc) 2.2 manual. In particular, Chapters "6. Character Set Handling" and "7 Locales and Internationalization"<p>Drepper, Ulrich, Numerous, late-night email correspondence</p><p>Feather, Clive, "A brief description of Normative Addendum 1," in particular the parts on Extended Character Setshttp://www.lysator.liu.se/c/na1.html</p><p>Haible, Bruno, "The Unicode HOWTO" v0.18, 4 August 2000ftp://ftp.ilog.fr/pub/Users/haible/utf8/Unicode-HOWTO.html</p><p>ISO/IEC 14882:1998 Programming languages - C++</p><p>ISO/IEC 9899:1999 Programming languages - C</p><p>Khun, Markus, "UTF-8 and Unicode FAQ for Unix/Linux"http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html</p><p>Langer, Angelika and Klaus Kreft, Standard C++ IOStreams and Locales, Advanced Programmer's Guide and Reference, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. 2000</p><p>Stroustrup, Bjarne, Appendix D, The C++ Programming Language, Special Edition, Addison Wesley, Inc. 2000</p><p>System Interface Definitions, Issue 6 (IEEE Std. 1003.1-200x)The Open Group/The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.http://www.opennc.org/austin/docreg.html</p></body></html>